Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41011999›Full record

ReviewPlants (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Current Assessment and Future Perspectives on Phytoremediation of Heavy Metals.

Aniruddha Acharya, Nacer Bellaloui, Andrej Pilipovic, Enrique Perez, Miller Maddox-Mandolini, Hania De La Fuente

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aniruddha AcharyaDepartment of Biological & Earth Sciences, Arkansas Tech University, Russellville, AR 72801, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6774-5934
Nacer BellalouiCrop Genetics Research Unit, Agriculture Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, 141 Experiment Station Road, Stoneville, MS 38776, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4368-6095
Andrej PilipovicNatural Resources Research Institute (NRRI), University of Minnesota, Duluth, MN 55811, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9458-0581
Enrique PerezDepartment of Biology & Chemistry, Texas A&M International University, Laredo, TX 78041, USA.
Miller Maddox-MandoliniCollege of Nursing, Health & Sciences, Delta State University, Cleveland, MS 38733, USA.
Hania De La FuenteDepartment of Biology & Chemistry, Texas A&M International University, Laredo, TX 78041, USA.

Funding

Understanding Hesitant AdoptersP20GM103429 · NIGMS · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI Lawrence E Cornett · 2012 to 2026
$60.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103429
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heavy metals such as zinc, manganese, nickel, cobalt, copper, iron, and molybdenum are required in minute quantities to maintain optimal biological functions. However, most other heavy metals are not required for living cells; thus, their accumulation within cells and tissues poses a serious threat to human health and the environment. Phytoremediation can offer a safe, inexpensive, and ecologically sustainable technique to clean habitats contaminated with heavy metals. Several herbaceous and woody plants have been identified and utilized as potential candidates for phytoremediation, and the technique has transformed from being in the formative stage, where it was confined to laboratories and greenhouses, to becoming a widely applied technology involving field trials across the globe. However, recently, several field studies have shown promising results that can propel the large-scale implementation of this technology at industrial sites and in urban agriculture. The commercialization of this technique is possible if an interdisciplinary approach is employed to increase its efficiency. Identification of the genetic mechanisms and the cell signaling pathways involved in phytoremediation may support biotechnological intervention through OMICS and CRISPR approaches, resulting in an improvement in the efficiency of the process. This review presents a comprehensive overview of phytoremediation with a focus on the current assessment and future perspectives of the technique. It illustrates the concept of phytoremediation, the ecological and commercial benefits, and the types of phytoremediation. The candidate plants and factors that influence phytoremediation are discussed. The physiological and molecular mechanisms, along with perspectives on the future of the technique, are also illustrated. This review presents clear and updated information on this rapidly evolving technology, thus providing the public and private sectors with essential knowledge on phytoremediation mechanisms. This may assist in policy development for the management of heavy metals while accelerating the development of transgenic plants or other tools that might be more efficient in phytoremediation.

Indexed as

agricultureenvironmentheavy metalsphytoremediationtechnology

Identifiers

PMID41011999
PMCPMC12473401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.