ArticleMicromachines2025
Multi-Level Scale Attention Fusion Network for Adhesive Spots Segmentation in Microlens Packaging.
Article in Micromachines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The demand for high-quality beams from high-power lasers has led to the need for high-precision inspection of adhesion points for collimating lens packages. In this paper, we propose a Multi-Level Scale Attention Fusion Network (MLSAFNet) by fusing a Multi-Level Attention Module (MLAM) and a Multi-Scale Channel-Guided Module (MSCGM) to achieve highly accurate and robust adhesive spots detection. Additionally, we built a Laser Lens Adhesive Spots (LLAS) dataset using automated lens packaging equipment and performed pixel-by-pixel standardization for the first time. Extensive experimental results show that the mean intersection over union (mIoU) of MLSAFNet reaches 91.15%, and its maximum values of localization error and area measurement error are 21.83 μm and 0.003 mm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.