ArticleMicromachines2025
Study of the Equivalent Stiffness of a Non-Contact Piezoelectric Actuator's Micro-Displacement Amplification Mechanism.
Article in Micromachines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Torque Control for a Novel Non-Contact Piezoelectric Motor Modulated by Electromagnetic Force.Micromachines · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To address the issues of mechanical wear and limited service life in conventional contact piezoelectric actuators, this study proposes a non-contact piezoelectric actuator employing compressed air for energy transmission; we elucidate its structure and operating principle. The working performance of the actuator is significantly affected by the amplification performance of its micro-displacement amplification mechanism, which itself is closely dependent on the mechanism's stiffness. Mathematical models for both the filleted straight-beam flexure hinge and the micro-displacement amplification mechanism are established. Analytical equations for calculating the equivalent stiffness of the hinge and the mechanism are derived. The variations in the hinge's bending stiffness and tensile stiffness, as well as the mechanism's equivalent stiffness with key structural parameters, are investigated. The stress distribution of the micro-displacement amplification mechanism is analyzed to evaluate the rationality and reliability of its structural design. A prototype is fabricated and equivalent stiffness tests are conducted. The theoretical calculation is basically consistent with the experimental results, verifying the accuracy of the stiffness model. The results show that flexure hinge tensile stiffness significantly exceeds the bending stiffness, permitting the simplification of the hinge stiffness model. Hinge minimum thickness and beam length critically affect mechanism stiffness; reducing thickness or increasing beam length lowers stiffness, boosting displacement amplification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.