ArticleMicromachines2025
Optimization of PLGA Nanoparticle Formulation via Microfluidic and Batch Nanoprecipitation Techniques.
Article in Micromachines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Data-driven and mechanistic modelling of PLGA nanoparticle formation in hydrodynamic flow focusing microfluidics.Lab on a chip · 2026Article
- The role of nanoparticles in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: mechanisms, delivery platforms, translational challenges, and future directions.Discover nano · 2026Review
- Formulation of Peptide-Based Nanoparticles Using a Microfluidic Device.Journal of peptide science : an official publication of the European Peptide Society · 2026Article
- The Current Application Prospects of Nanomedicine in Renal Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- PLGA-Based Co-Delivery Nanoformulations: Overview, Strategies, and Recent Advances.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Polymer- and Lipid-Based Nanostructures for Wound Healing with Barrier-Resolved Design.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Polymeric nanoparticles based on poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) are widely used in drug delivery, yet scalable and reproducible production methods remain a major challenge. In this study, we combine experimental nanoprecipitation and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling to optimize PLGA nanoparticle formulation using both traditional batch and microfluidic methods. While Design of Experiments (DoE) was used to optimize the batch process, microfluidic mixing was systematically explored by varying flow parameters such as the flow rate ratio (FRR) and total flow rate (TFR). We compared two microfluidic mixer designs with Y-junction and three-inlet junction geometries to evaluate their impact on the mixing efficiency and nanoparticle formation. Experimental results revealed that the three-inlet design produced smaller, more uniform nanoparticles with superior post-lyophilization stability. CFD simulations confirmed these findings by displaying velocity fields and PLGA concentration gradients, demonstrating significantly more homogeneous mixing and efficient interfacial contact in the three-inlet configuration. Furthermore, simulated outlet concentrations were used to predict the nanoparticle size via theoretical modeling, which closely agreed with the experimental data. This integrated approach highlights the importance of microfluidic geometry in controlling nanoparticle nucleation dynamics and provides a framework for rational design of scalable nanomedicine production systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.