Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41011863›Full record

ArticleMicromachines2025

Optimization of PLGA Nanoparticle Formulation via Microfluidic and Batch Nanoprecipitation Techniques.

Gül Kozalak, Salar Heyat Davoudian, Evangelos Natsaridis, Nubia Gogniat, Ali Koşar, Oya Tagit

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Micromachines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Formulation of Peptide-Based Nanoparticles Using a Microfluidic Device.Journal of peptide science : an official publication of the European Peptide Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gül KozalakGroup of Biointerfaces, Institute of Chemistry and Bioanalytics, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, Hofackerstrasse 30, 4132 Muttenz, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2928-6474
Salar Heyat DavoudianFaculty of Engineering and Natural Science, Sabancı University, Istanbul 34956, Turkey.
Evangelos NatsaridisGroup of Biointerfaces, Institute of Chemistry and Bioanalytics, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, Hofackerstrasse 30, 4132 Muttenz, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1786-5671
Nubia GogniatGroup of Biointerfaces, Institute of Chemistry and Bioanalytics, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, Hofackerstrasse 30, 4132 Muttenz, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0004-9669-2554
Ali KoşarFaculty of Engineering and Natural Science, Sabancı University, Istanbul 34956, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-6283-6717
Oya TagitGroup of Biointerfaces, Institute of Chemistry and Bioanalytics, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, Hofackerstrasse 30, 4132 Muttenz, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5773-6647

Funding

European Molecular Biology Organization, Scientific Exchange Grant 10971
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polymeric nanoparticles based on poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) are widely used in drug delivery, yet scalable and reproducible production methods remain a major challenge. In this study, we combine experimental nanoprecipitation and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling to optimize PLGA nanoparticle formulation using both traditional batch and microfluidic methods. While Design of Experiments (DoE) was used to optimize the batch process, microfluidic mixing was systematically explored by varying flow parameters such as the flow rate ratio (FRR) and total flow rate (TFR). We compared two microfluidic mixer designs with Y-junction and three-inlet junction geometries to evaluate their impact on the mixing efficiency and nanoparticle formation. Experimental results revealed that the three-inlet design produced smaller, more uniform nanoparticles with superior post-lyophilization stability. CFD simulations confirmed these findings by displaying velocity fields and PLGA concentration gradients, demonstrating significantly more homogeneous mixing and efficient interfacial contact in the three-inlet configuration. Furthermore, simulated outlet concentrations were used to predict the nanoparticle size via theoretical modeling, which closely agreed with the experimental data. This integrated approach highlights the importance of microfluidic geometry in controlling nanoparticle nucleation dynamics and provides a framework for rational design of scalable nanomedicine production systems.

Indexed as

computational fluid dynamicsdesign of experimentsmicrofluidicsnanoprecipitationPLGA nanoparticles

Identifiers

PMID41011863
PMCPMC12471678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.