ArticlePathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Bayesian Assessment of True Prevalence of Paratuberculosis Infection in Dairy Herds and Their Parity Subgroups.
Article in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Paratuberculosis is a widespread infectious disease in ruminants that leads to significant economic losses in livestock production. In this study, we developed a practical method for predicting the likelihood of the herd-level presence of the infection and estimating its prevalence in subgroups of a dairy herd-specifically, first-time calving cows (primiparous) and those that have calved more than once (multiparous). We fit a Bayesian hierarchical model to cow-level data, incorporating prior knowledge about regional prevalence of infection to improve the accuracy and reliability of the estimates. The model was tested using synthetic data representing six regional scenarios in four countries (Chile, Denmark, Italy, and Hungary). The likelihood that a herd is infected is evaluated using Bayes factors and posterior probability of infection. Both the Bayes factor and the posterior probability of infection classified the simulated herds in accordance with the proportions of infected herds. Summary measures obtained for within-herd true prevalence estimates demonstrated acceptable accuracy. The R and STAN codes of the model are available as an open-access tool. The model can be customized for any region using real local data and prior information. The relationship between true and apparent prevalence is linear and stable and therefore can be estimated well. We found that, in Hungary, the TP/AP ratios were 1.6 and 1.5 for primi- and multiparous cows, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.