Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41011495›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2025

Uncovering DENV, CHIKV, and ZIKV in Urban Wastewater in Brazil Through Genomic and Molecular Screening.

Juliana Calabria de Araujo, Ana Paula A Carvalho, Talita Adelino, Felipe Campos M Iani, Natalia Rocha Guimaraes, Sara Candida F Santos, Cintia D Leal, Manuelle Natividade, Mauricio Lima, Mariana Almada and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Juliana Calabria de AraujoDepartment of Sanitary and Environmental Engineering, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais-UFMG, Belo Horizonte 31270-901, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5497-8675
Ana Paula A CarvalhoDepartment of Sanitary and Environmental Engineering, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais-UFMG, Belo Horizonte 31270-901, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0003-2713-2118
Talita AdelinoLaboratório Central de Saúde Pública, Fundação Ezequiel Dias, Belo Horizonte 30510-010, Brazil.
Felipe Campos M IaniLaboratório Central de Saúde Pública, Fundação Ezequiel Dias, Belo Horizonte 30510-010, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3629-8529
Natalia Rocha GuimaraesLaboratório Central de Saúde Pública, Fundação Ezequiel Dias, Belo Horizonte 30510-010, Brazil.
Sara Candida F SantosLaboratório Central de Saúde Pública, Fundação Ezequiel Dias, Belo Horizonte 30510-010, Brazil.
Cintia D LealDepartment of Sanitary and Environmental Engineering, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais-UFMG, Belo Horizonte 31270-901, Brazil.
Manuelle NatividadeFarGenix-Pharmacogenomics Laboratory, Department of Social Pharmacy, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais-UFMG, Belo Horizonte 31270-901, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0009-9521-0900
Mauricio LimaLaboratório Central de Saúde Pública, Fundação Ezequiel Dias, Belo Horizonte 30510-010, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0830-3909
Mariana AlmadaCentro Federal de Educação Tecnológica-CEFET-MG, Belo Horizonte 30510-000, Brazil.
Ana Carolina BertuceDepartment of Sanitary and Environmental Engineering, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais-UFMG, Belo Horizonte 31270-901, Brazil.
Augusto GuerraFarGenix-Pharmacogenomics Laboratory, Department of Social Pharmacy, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais-UFMG, Belo Horizonte 31270-901, Brazil.
Maria Cristina M CostaCentro Federal de Educação Tecnológica-CEFET-MG, Belo Horizonte 30510-000, Brazil.
Flavia SaiaDepartament of Marine Sciences, Universidade Federal de São Paulo-UNIFESP, Santos 11070-100, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9199-077X
Vagner FonsecaCentre for Epidemic Response and Innovation (CERI), School for Data Science and Computational Thinking, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch 7600, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-5521-6448
Marta GiovanettiDepartment of Sciences and Technologies for Sustainable Development and One Health, Universita Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, 00128 Roma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5849-7326
Livia V FrutuosoCoordenação Geral de Vigilância de Arboviroses, Departamento de Doenças Transmissíveis, Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde e Ambiente, Ministério da Saúde, Brasília 70058-900, Brazil.
Luiz Carlos Junior AlcantaraInstituto René Rachou, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Belo Horizonte 21040-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6769-9931

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 302899/2022-1Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 424004/2021Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa de Minas Gerais- FAPEMIG 01779-23
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated and compared molecular methods (Whole Genome Sequencing-WGS, MinION, and RT-qPCR) for the detection of arboviruses Dengue (DENV), Chikungunya (CHIKV), and Zika (ZIKV) in 63 hospital and municipal wastewater samples collected from July 2022 to May 2023 in the region of Belo Horizonte, Brazil. Detection rates varied substantially across the methods (WGS, MinION, and RT-qPCR). DENV was identified in 24% (15/63) of samples using a hybrid capture method of WGS and MinION sequencing and in 66.6% (20/30) using only WGS but was not detected using the CDC Trioplex RT-PCR Assay Kit or ZDC (IBMP). CHIKV was detected in 19.0% (12/63) of the samples by WGS and MinION and in 85.7% (12/14) using only MinION sequencing. Using the RT-qPCR kit to detect CHIKV yielded a rate of 4.7% (3/63) in false positives. ZIKV was found in only one sample (1/63) by WGS, while RT-qPCR yielded a high false positive rate (65.1%, 41/63). These findings highlight the operational advantage of these methods (WGS and MinION) for enhancing early-warning surveillance where standard RT-qPCR might underperform in low-prevalence settings. This is the first study that has compared these methods to detect and genetically characterize DENV, CHICK, and ZIKV in wastewater in Brazil and has indicated that hospital wastewater can be used as a sentinel system for arbovirus surveillance. The relative effectiveness of genomic wastewater surveillance for arboviruses was demonstrated, and it was found that diagnostic RT-qPCR kits used for clinical samples were not directly suitable for environmental surveillance. The feasibility of arbovirus wastewater surveillance as an epidemiological tool was demonstrated, although absolute quantifications were not performed.

Indexed as

arbovirusgenomic surveillancemolecular screeningpublic health laboratoriesRT-qPCR diagnostic kitwastewater surveillance

Identifiers

PMID41011495
PMCPMC12472667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.