ArticleMicroorganisms2025
The Omicron Wave in Tunisia: Dynamic, Diversity, and Phylogenetic Analyses.
Article in Microorganisms, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant has exhibited a rapid progression around the world, but its molecular insights in North Africa remain understudied. This study characterizes the genetic diversity, dynamics, and evolutionary trends of the Omicron variant in Tunisia over a 33-month period (December 2021-August 2024). In total, 928 high-quality whole-genome sequences were considered in this study, of which 559 were retrieved from the GISAID database and 369 were generated in our laboratory. Phylogenetic analysis of the dominant subvariants (BA.1, BA.2, and BA.5) was performed using IQ-TREE. BA.2 was the predominant subvariant (38%), followed by BA.1 (24.0%), Omicron recombinants (19%), and BA.5 (18%). BA.2 diversified into JN, KP, and BN sub-lineages. Recombinants were dominated by XBB (98.8%), primarily including EG.4, XBB.1.5, and XBB.2.3.11, with rare detection of XDK and XDQ. Phylogenetic analysis revealed local clusters in BA.1, BA.2, and BA.5 alongside imported strains. Tunisia's Omicron wave was mainly driven by BA.2 and its recombinants, with evidence of localized viral evolution and sporadic introductions. The detection of rare recombinants underlines the importance of integrating regional genomic surveillance with epidemiological data in order to help guide future public health strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.