Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41011492›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2025

Impact of Organic and Conventional Husbandry Systems on the Gut Microbiome and Resistome in Pigs.

Judith Wedemeyer, Nele Lechleiter, Andreas Vernunft, Jessica Junker, Timo Homeier-Bachmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Judith WedemeyerInstitute of Epidemiology, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Südufer 10, 17493 Greifswald, Germany.
Nele LechleiterInstitute of Epidemiology, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Südufer 10, 17493 Greifswald, Germany.
Andreas VernunftResearch Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), Wilhelm-Stahl-Allee 2, 18196 Dummerstorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8147-319X
Jessica JunkerInstitute of Epidemiology, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Südufer 10, 17493 Greifswald, Germany.
Timo Homeier-BachmannInstitute of Epidemiology, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Südufer 10, 17493 Greifswald, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8135-3814

Funding

Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Regional Identity (BMLEH) 28KIDA001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gut microbiome of pigs is important for energy supply and impacts the animals' health. Additionally, the microbiota can act as a reservoir for antimicrobial resistance genes (ARG). Different husbandry systems in pig farming can influence the microbiome and the overall composition of the resistome, i.e., the complete collection of ARG. In this study, pooled fecal samples were collected repeatedly in one pig farm over a period of two years. One group of animals was kept in organic husbandry conditions with access to an outdoor run, while the other group was kept according to conventional standards. Shotgun metagenomic sequencing was performed on the samples. Additionally,

Indexed as

animal husbandryantimicrobial resistance genesmetagenomicsmicrobiomeorganic farmingpigresistome

Identifiers

PMID41011492
PMCPMC12472612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.