Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41011389›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2025

Marco Aurelio Fifolato, Lorena Mosconi Clemente, Adriana Barbosa Ribeiro, Viviane de Cássia Oliveira, Helio Cesar Salgado, Evandro Watanabe, Cláudia Helena Lovato da Silva

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marco Aurelio FifolatoDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthesis, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Avenida do Café S/N, Ribeirão Preto 14040-904, São Paulo, Brazil.
Lorena Mosconi ClementeDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthesis, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Avenida do Café S/N, Ribeirão Preto 14040-904, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7701-9311
Adriana Barbosa RibeiroDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthesis, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Avenida do Café S/N, Ribeirão Preto 14040-904, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3108-8589
Viviane de Cássia OliveiraDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthesis, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Avenida do Café S/N, Ribeirão Preto 14040-904, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0734-0652
Helio Cesar SalgadoDepartment of Physiology, Ribeirão Preto Medical School. University of São Paulo, Avenida do Café S/N, Ribeirão Preto 14040-904, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7351-5740
Evandro WatanabeDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Avenida do Café S/N, Ribeirão Preto 14040-904, São Paulo, Brazil.
Cláudia Helena Lovato da SilvaDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthesis, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Avenida do Café S/N, Ribeirão Preto 14040-904, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1629-2207

Funding

FAPESP 2020/06043-7FAPESP 2022/04995-6
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complete dentures (CD) are prone to biofilm formation, particularly by Candida species, which may lead to denture stomatitis (DS). As edentulism remains highly prevalent among the global ageing population, denture-related infections represent a significant public health concern. The novelty of this study lies in integrating the clinical severity of DS with the prevalence, microbial load, and antifungal susceptibility profile of

Indexed as

antifungalsCandida spp.complete denturedenture stomatitissusceptibility

Identifiers

PMID41011389
PMCPMC12472070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.