Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41011328›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2025

Metagenomic Assembled Genomes of a

Paul D Boudreau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Novel Genomes ofMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Paul D BoudreauDepartment of BioMolecular Sciences, University of Mississippi School of Pharmacy, Oxford, MS 38677, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5416-4404

Funding

Pilot Project ProgramP30GM122733 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI · PI WILLETT, KRISTINE L · 2018 to 2022
$5.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS 5P30GM122733-03NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM122733
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sequencing cyanobacteria from xenic cultures is often challenging when their DNA extracts are confounded by DNA from their heterotrophic microbiome. Using an iterative DNA lysis protocol can fractionate between DNA from the cyanobacterium and the heterotrophic strains. To further demonstrate the utility of this protocol, it was used to sequence another xenic culture of cyanobacteria. This effort led to the assembly of a megabase-length cyanobacterial chromosome; however, repeated ribosomal regions created assembly issues even after adding data from another sequencing run to improve coverage. A separate DNA preparation from a single cell lysis step was also run for comparison but yielded a markedly lower proportion of cyanobacterial reads (<2%). Instead, the circular cyanobacterial chromosome was closed with targeted amplicon sequencing. Phylogenetic analysis assigned this strain to the genus

Indexed as

cell lysisDNA extractionmicrobiomewhole genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID41011328
PMCPMC12472891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.