ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2025
Between Promise and Proof: Evaluating PRP's Role in Modern Gynecology.
Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparing Regenerative and Rehabilitative Strategies for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: Platelet-Rich Plasma vs. Pelvic Floor Muscle Training-A Prospective Study Evaluating Quality of Life.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Does Diabetes Matter? The Efficacy of PRP on the Quality of Life in Stress Urinary Incontinence.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has emerged as a promising regenerative therapy in various medical fields, including the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in women. PRP promotes regeneration by delivering a concentrated dose of platelets to damaged tissues, triggering healing mechanisms such as hemostasis, revascularization, and connective tissue regeneration through the release of growth factors. Despite evidence supporting the short- and medium-term benefits of PRP, its long-term efficacy remains unclear, largely due to the limited duration of follow-up in existing studies. Furthermore, the lack of standardized protocols for both preparation and administration of PRP poses a significant challenge to accurately assessing and comparing its sustained therapeutic outcomes. This literature review utilized comprehensive searches of PubMed and Google Scholar databases to analyze current evidence regarding PRP's role in managing SUI in women. SUI, often resulting from weakened pubo-urethral ligament or intrinsic sphincter dysfunction due to childbirth, aging, or hormonal changes, significantly impacts quality of life. PRP offers a safe, minimally invasive, and cost-effective treatment option; however, further large-scale, well-designed studies are necessary to define optimal protocols and confirm long-term benefits. Advancing understanding of PRP therapy could substantially improve clinical management and patient quality of life in SUI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.