ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Rheological Theory Applied to Mechanical Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A New Paradigm for Understanding and Preventing Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Association Between Mechanical Power and Mortality in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Critical care medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Effects of prone versus supine position during enteral nutrition on clinical outcomes and complications in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Pooled it
- Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury: Mechanotransduction and Potential Therapeutic Targets.MedComm · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The concept of mechanical power (MP) has emerged as a comprehensive indicator of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). It integrates the effects of tidal volume, airway pressures, respiratory rate, and flow. However, applying MP as a universal threshold (e.g., 12 J/min) across heterogeneous patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) may be inadequate. This review introduces the rheological model, which conceptualizes the lung as a viscoelastic body (i.e., one that exhibits both elastic and viscous properties), and applies it to ARDS ventilation. The rheological model may offer individualized MP thresholds. The potential benefits of adjusting MP based on ideal body weight (J/min/kg) are discussed and, more accurately, on static compliance (J/min/L). Static compliance could better reflect functional lung size, though clinical validation remains needed. Preliminary clinical and modeling evidence suggests that normalized MP correlates more closely with mortality than absolute MP and aligns with pulmonary stress-strain behavior. This normalization provides a more precise risk stratification and facilitates the easier setting of ventilation targets, particularly in patients with low compliance or abnormal body composition. This review clarifies definitions and consolidates evidence, highlights the clinical implications of rheology for lung-protective strategies. MP normalization within a lung-protective strategy could enhance the safety and efficacy of mechanical ventilation; however, clinical validation is still required. This review summarizes the theoretical foundations, supporting evidence, and clinical implications of this approach within the broader context of rheological modeling in ARDS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.