ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Current Clinical Trial Landscape of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A New Era of Landmark Trials.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Secretogranin II serves as a potential prognostic biomarker and correlates with the immune microenvironment in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- The Evolving Role of Second- and Third-Generation Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Gastrointestinal Malignancies: Advances in Targeted Therapy with Sunitinib, Regorafenib, and Avapritinib.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Conserved Neuronal-like and Secretory Programs Define the Spatial Architecture of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are a heterogeneous group of malignancies characterized by varying degrees of aggressiveness and clinical behavior. Despite advancements in treatment, including targeted therapies such as sunitinib and everolimus, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE, and chemotherapy regimens like capecitabine plus temozolomide, the advanced GEP-NETs remain largely incurable. The limited efficacy of current treatments highlights the urgent need for novel therapeutic strategies. Recent years have seen a rise in several landmark clinical trials aimed at exploring new agents and combinations to improve patient outcomes in GEP-NETs. This literature review focuses on the ongoing clinical trials that hold promise for advancing the treatment landscape of GEP-NETs. We include some industry- and cooperative group-sponsored, phase II-III, randomized, and comparative trials in our review. We analyze the design, rationale, objectives, and preliminary findings of these trials, with a particular emphasis on those with pending results that may offer new insights into potential therapeutic targets. By examining these trials, we aim to provide a comprehensive overview of the evolving strategies in the management of GEP-NETs and underscore the importance of continued research innovation in addressing the challenges posed by the heterogeneity of GEP-NETs and in the pursuit of more effective and potentially curative treatment options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.