Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41010723›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025

Augmented Decisions: AI-Enhanced Accuracy in Glaucoma Diagnosis and Treatment.

Marco Zeppieri, Caterina Gagliano, Daniele Tognetto, Mutali Musa, Alessandro Avitabile, Fabiana D'Esposito, Simonetta Gaia Nicolosi, Matteo Capobianco

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. A Review of the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Ophthalmology Imaging: Approximation to Ocular Histopathology.APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marco ZeppieriDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0999-5545
Caterina GaglianoDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Enna "Kore", Piazza dell'Università, 94100 Enna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8424-0068
Daniele TognettoDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, 34127 Trieste, Italy.
Mutali MusaDepartment of Optometry, University of Benin, Benin City 300238, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0001-7486-8361
Alessandro AvitabileFaculty of Medicine, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy.ORCID 0009-0003-1051-876X
Fabiana D'EspositoDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Enna "Kore", Piazza dell'Università, 94100 Enna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7938-876X
Simonetta Gaia NicolosiFaculty of Medicine, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy.
Matteo CapobiancoEye Clinic, Catania University, Policlinico G. Rodolico, Via Santa Sofia, 95121 Catania, Italy.ORCID 0009-0009-2969-8610

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glaucoma remains a leading cause of irreversible blindness. We reviewed more than 150 peer-reviewed studies (January 2019-July 2025) that applied artificial or augmented intelligence (AI/AuI) to glaucoma care. Deep learning systems analyzing fundus photographs or OCT volumes routinely achieved area-under-the-curve values around 0.95 and matched-or exceeded-subspecialists in prospective tests. Sequence-aware models detected visual field worsening up to 1.7 years earlier than conventional linear trends, while a baseline multimodal network integrating OCT, visual field, and clinical data predicted the need for incisional surgery with AUROC 0.92. Offline smartphone triage in community clinics reached sensitivities near 94% and specificities between 86% and 94%, illustrating feasibility in low-resource settings. Large language models answered glaucoma case questions with specialist-level accuracy but still require human oversight. Key obstacles include algorithmic bias, workflow integration, and compliance with emerging regulations, such as the EU AI Act and FDA GMLP. With rigorous validation, bias auditing, and transparent change control, AI/AuI can augment-rather than replace-clinician expertise, enabling earlier intervention, tailored therapy, and more equitable access to glaucoma care worldwide.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceaugmented intelligenceclinical decision supportdeep learningexplainable AIfederated learningglaucomaoptical coherence tomographyteleophthalmologyvisual field

Identifiers

PMID41010723
PMCPMC12471005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.