ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Impact of Family Involvement in Cardiac Rehabilitation-Insights from a Literature Review.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Association between social support and life space mobility in older patients after percutaneous coronary intervention: mediating roles of health literacy and intrinsic capacity.Frontiers in public health · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conventional medicine relies solely on the interaction between the doctor and the patient, not necessarily including the family in discussions about therapy and diagnosis. Nevertheless, recent research indicates that the presence of a family member during a doctor's visit improves both communication between the doctor and the patient, as well as the patient's understanding of information related to their health condition. Additionally, by adopting this approach, family members can better understand what obligations arise at this stage and the patient's needs. Studies have shown that collaboration with family members has significantly reduced mortality rate and improved their quality of life, as the family strengthened their confidence in their abilities by providing moral and emotional support. Even though family support and involvement seem to be very important, sometimes patients have reported that overly active family involvement becomes intrusive, as it violates their privacy and disrupts their autonomy. That is why it is important for family members directly involved in recovery to learn to respect the boundaries set by the patient. Both the patient and their family experience stressful moments during this recovery period, which necessitate their attention. The involvement of family members in the recovery process reduces their levels of anxiety and stress, as they can closely monitor the patient's progress. Additionally, integrating family members into the rehabilitation program can provide further benefits for the patient, as the presence of a family member leads to increased comfort and motivation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.