ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
V-Notes Sentinel Lymph Node Staging for Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07583329 (Comparison of Sentinel Lymph Node Applications in Endometrial Cancer Cases Performed With V-NOTES and Conventional Laparoscopy), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison of Sentinel Lymph Node Applications in Endometrial Cancer Cases Performed With V-NOTES and Conventional Laparoscopy: A Multicenter Prospective Observational Study
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES) in Patients with Gynecological Malignancies: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Mid-Term Oncological Outcomes of Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery Compared with Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Surgical approach selection and perioperative-pathological characteristics in endometrial cancer: a retrospective observational study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.