ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Natural History of Gastric Subepithelial Tumors: Long-Term Outcomes and Surveillance Strategies.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- [Diagnosis and Management of Asymptomatic Upper Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Lesions].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2026Guideline
- Contrast-Enhanced Harmonic Endoscopic Ultrasonography for Diagnosing Gastric Subepithelial Tumors.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gastric subepithelial tumors (SETs) are commonly identified during routine endoscopy. Most SETs are asymptomatic and small (<2 cm) and exhibit benign behavior over time. Various histopathological types exist, including benign lesions, such as lipomas and heterotopic pancreas, and malignant lesions, such as gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) plays a critical role in evaluating the lesion size, layer of origin, border characteristics, and internal echogenicity. Approximately 4-15% of gastric SETs increase in size over ~5 years. The risk factors for the growth and malignant potential of SETs include initial tumor size, irregular or heterogeneous EUS features, mucosal ulceration, and confirmed GIST diagnosis. While lesions ≥2 cm in size or those with high-risk features are typically subjected to resection, small and low-risk SETs are managed with periodic EUS or endoscopic surveillance. Tissue acquisition via EUS-guided biopsy or endoscopic resection is warranted for indeterminate or suspicious cases. A risk-stratified approach minimizes unnecessary interventions while enabling timely detection of clinically significant lesions. Surveillance protocols should be tailored according to characteristics of SETs, patient comorbidities, and diagnostic confidence. This review highlights the long-term outcomes of gastric SETs, evaluates established risk factors for their growth and malignant potential, and discusses evidence-based strategies for surveillance and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.