Observational studyNutrients2025
Feeding Models in Classical Phenylketonuria: Do They Make a Difference in Infant Sleep?
Observational study in Nutrients, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPhenylketonuria (PKU) is an inherited metabolic disorder that requires early diagnosis and strict phenylalanine (Phe)-restricted diet to prevent neurocognitive impairment. Various infant feeding models have been used to achieve optimal metabolic control during early life. The aim of this study was to compare two different feeding models for infants with classical PKU in terms of metabolic control, growth parameters, micronutrient status, the process of introducing complementary foods, and with a particular focus on sleep quality.
methodsIn this prospective observational study, 26 infants with classical PKU were followed for 12 months. Patients were assigned to one of two feeding groups: Group-1 received breast milk and Phe-free formula in alternating feeds, while Group-2 received Phe-free formula followed by breastfeeding until satiety. Blood Phe, micronutrient levels and anthropometric measurements were recorded. Sleep quality was evaluated using the Brief Infant Sleep Questionnaire-Revised (BISQ-R). A structured set of parental questions was used to evaluate their experiences during the complementary feeding period.
resultsNo statistically significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of blood Phe levels, anthropometric measurements, serum levels of iron, ferritin, vitamin-B12, vitamin-D, and zinc. Complementary feeding tolerance were similar across the groups. The BISQ-R analysis revealed no significant differences between the groups.
conclusionsBoth feeding models were equally effective in maintaining metabolic control, supporting normal growth, complementary feeding processes, and preserving sleep quality during infancy. These findings suggest that either approach can be adopted based on the preference of the caregiver and the practicality of the clinical setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.