Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41010367›Full record

ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Does Nitrate Supplementation Improve Muscle Strength, Power, and Sprint Performance in Females? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Fanhao Meng, Yuhang Liu, Bopeng Qiu, Juan Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fanhao MengSchool of Strength and Conditioning Training, Beijing Sport University, Beijing 100084, China.
Yuhang LiuExercise and Sport Nutrition Lab, Department of Kinesiology and Sport Management, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-4243, USA.
Bopeng QiuSchool of Strength and Conditioning Training, Beijing Sport University, Beijing 100084, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4028-0863
Juan LiSchool of Physical Education and Sports, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInorganic nitrate (NO

objectiveThis review assessed the acute effects of nitrate supplementation on muscle strength, power, and sprint performance in healthy females.

methodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and Cochrane CENTRAL, from inception to July 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examined the effects of oral inorganic nitrate (e.g., beetroot juice or nitrate salts) in healthy females were included. Eligible studies involved (i) healthy women aged 18-30, (ii) nitrate supplementation vs. placebo, and (iii) outcome measures of muscle strength (e.g., MVC), power (e.g., countermovement jump height, peak power), or sprint performance (e.g., sprint time or repeated sprint ability). Studies were excluded if they did not report sex-specific results or lacked relevant physical performance outcomes. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted for each outcome.

resultsNitrate supplementation had small, non-significant effects on muscle strength (SMD = 0.10, 95% CI: -0.10 to 0.30,

conclusionsInorganic nitrate supplementation may modestly enhance power in healthy females but does not appear to significantly improve muscle strength or sprint performance. These findings highlight the importance of sex-specific research in sports nutrition to guide targeted supplementation strategies for female athletes.

Indexed as

beetroot juicefemale athletesinorganic nitratemuscle strengthpowersprint performance

Identifiers

PMID41010367
PMCPMC12471447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.