Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41010324›Full record

ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Vaginal Microbiome and Its Relationship with Assisted Reproduction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Marise Samama, Joji Ueno, Eduardo Carvalho de Arruda Veiga, Rita C C P Piscopo, Fabio Ikeda, Nina Pires de Lemos, Lucas Tadeu Bidinotto, Márcia Guimarães da Silva, Zsuzsanna Jarmy Di Bella, Frida Entezami

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Marise SamamaDepartment of Gynecoloy, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Federal University of São Paulo-UNIFESP, São Paulo 04024-002, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3732-1057
Joji UenoIVF Department, GERA Institute for Teaching and Research Reproductive Medicine São Paulo, São Paulo 01409-001, Brazil.
Eduardo Carvalho de Arruda VeigaIVF Department, GERA Institute for Teaching and Research Reproductive Medicine São Paulo, São Paulo 01409-001, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0167-861X
Rita C C P PiscopoIVF Department, GERA Institute for Teaching and Research Reproductive Medicine São Paulo, São Paulo 01409-001, Brazil.
Fabio IkedaIVF Department, GERA Institute for Teaching and Research Reproductive Medicine São Paulo, São Paulo 01409-001, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0003-9644-7797
Nina Pires de LemosIVF Department, GERA Institute for Teaching and Research Reproductive Medicine São Paulo, São Paulo 01409-001, Brazil.
Lucas Tadeu BidinottoBarretos School of Health Sciences Dr. Paulo Prata-FACISB, Barretos 14785-002, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6909-8347
Márcia Guimarães da SilvaDepartment of Pathology, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University-Unesp, Botucatu 18607-340, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4663-7926
Zsuzsanna Jarmy Di BellaDepartment of Gynecoloy, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Federal University of São Paulo-UNIFESP, São Paulo 04024-002, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9179-3023
Frida EntezamiIVF Department, American Hospital of Paris, 92200 Neuilly-sur-Seine, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7891-1048

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

clinical pregnancy ratelive birth ratepregnancy losssystematic reviewvaginal microbiome

Identifiers

PMID41010324
PMCPMC12471688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.