Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41010309›Full record

ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Exploring Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Gestational Diabetes: A Systematic Review.

Bianca-Margareta Salmen, Delia Reurean-Pintilei, Teodor Salmen, Roxana-Elena Bohîlțea

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bianca-Margareta SalmenDoctoral School, 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-8957-737X
Delia Reurean-PintileiDepartment of Medical-Surgical and Complementary Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Biological Sciences, "Ștefan cel Mare" University, 720229 Suceava, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-3116-8151
Teodor SalmenDoctoral School, 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-4548-7441
Roxana-Elena BohîlțeaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Filantropia Clinical Hospital, 011132 Bucharest, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a glucose metabolism disorder that typically develops in the second half of pregnancy, transforming a normal pregnancy into a high-risk condition, with both short- and long-term complications for the mother and the fetus. Achieving optimal glycaemic control during pregnancy is essential for preventing these outcomes and could be realized using continuous glucose monitoring systems (CGMSs). This systematic review aims to evaluate the role of the CGMS as a potential diagnostic aid and predictor of maternal and fetal outcomes in GDM. (2) Methods: Following the PRISMA guidelines (protocol ID: CRD42024559169), we performed a literature search using the terms "(continuous glucose monitoring system OR CGMS) AND (gestational diabetes mellitus OR GDM)" in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases. (3) Results: Twelve studies were included, all reporting data on CGMS use in pregnancies complicated by GDM. The data included in our analysis are heterogeneous, the results suggesting that the CGMS may offer several advantages such as improved glycaemic control (by avoiding hyper- and hypoglycaemia), better gestational weight management, timely initiation of pharmacologic treatment, lower rates of preeclampsia, and improved neonatal outcomes. (4) Conclusions: the CGMS offers a more detailed assessment of both maternal and fetal exposure to high glucose levels, which could lead to earlier detection of those at risk for GDM complications and better guide treatment regimens, especially timely pharmacological intervention. While the current data are heterogeneous, reporting both limited or no benefits and superior benefits compared to the classic monitoring, larger longitudinal studies are mandatory to validate these findings and to better refine the role of CGMS in the monitoring and management of GDM.

Indexed as

CGMScontinuous glucose monitoring systemGDMgestational diabetes mellituspregnancy outcome

Identifiers

PMID41010309
PMCPMC12470761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.