Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41010276›Full record

ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Single or Double-Lumen Aspiration Needle? Revisiting Choices for In Vitro Fertilization or Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection-A Critical Review.

Gopinath Muruti, Mohd Faizal Ahmad, Muhammad Azrai Abu, Nurul Ilani Abdul Latif, Abdul Kadir Abdul Karim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gopinath MurutiAdvanced Reproductive Centre, Hospital Canselor Tuanku Muhriz, National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia.ORCID 0009-0007-9225-3521
Mohd Faizal AhmadAdvanced Reproductive Centre, Hospital Canselor Tuanku Muhriz, National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-2735-3274
Muhammad Azrai AbuAdvanced Reproductive Centre, Hospital Canselor Tuanku Muhriz, National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-0383-572X
Nurul Ilani Abdul LatifAdvanced Reproductive Centre, Hospital Canselor Tuanku Muhriz, National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia.
Abdul Kadir Abdul KarimAdvanced Reproductive Centre, Hospital Canselor Tuanku Muhriz, National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transvaginal ultrasound-guided follicle aspiration remains the gold standard for oocyte retrieval in assisted reproductive technology (ART). This procedure employs either a single-lumen aspiration needle (SLN) or double-lumen aspiration needle (DLN), both of which are effective modalities for oocyte retrieval. The primary objective of this review is to systematically compare the impact and clinical outcomes associated with the use of SLN versus DLN in women undergoing ART. A systematic literature search was conducted across two databases, PubMed and Google Scholar, encompassing publications from their inception until May 2025, and articles published in English. A total of five studies were included in the final analysis. The oocyte yield and the number of MII oocyte did not differ significantly between the groups. Procedural duration was markedly shorter in the SLN group compared to the DLN group. No significant differences were observed in procedure-related complications across groups. Two randomized controlled trials reported comparable fertilization rates and numbers of high-quality embryos between the two needle types. Additionally, clinical pregnancy rates, ongoing pregnancy rates, and live birth rates were similar between the SLN and DLN groups. In conclusion, the utilization ofan SLN for oocyte retrieval demonstrates comparable efficacy to that of a DLN.

Indexed as

aspiration needleintracytoplasmic sperm injectionin vitro fertilizationoocyte retrieval

Identifiers

PMID41010276
PMCPMC12470649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.