ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Experimental and Numerical Studies of "Wood-Composite" Reinforcement in Bending Sheared Wooden Beams Using Pre-Stressed Natural and Artificial Fibers.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent studies have confirmed the effectiveness of using natural fibers and fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) composites as methods to improve the mechanical properties of timber structures. This improvement is particularly evident in static and dynamic flexural and shear performance. Moreover, there is a paucity of literature pertaining to numerical models that predict the non-linear behaviour of low-quality timber beams reinforced with natural and man-made fibers. The present article expounds upon a shear bending study of timber beams reinforced with bars in addition to other materials. The experimental study yielded the following findings: the best properties were obtained with hybrid reinforcement, in comparison to the reference beams. The enhancement of load-bearing capacity and stiffness for beams that have been reinforced with pre-stressed basalt bars was found to be the most advantageous, with increases of approximately 17% and 8%, respectively. Natural fibers exhibited slightly lower values, with an increase in load-bearing capacity and stiffness of approximately 14% and 3%, respectively, when compared to beams that had not been reinforced. Moreover, the numerical analyses yielded analogous results to those obtained from the experimental study. The numerical models thus proved to be a valid tool with which to study the influence of the reinforcement factor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.