ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Simulation-Based Study on the Performance of NSM-CFRP Strengthening in Prestressed Concrete T-Beams Under Seismic Loading.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prestressed concrete structures are facing serviceability challenges due to rising live loads, material degradation, and seismic demands. Retrofitting with carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) offers a cost-effective alternative to full replacement. This study presents a finite element (FE) modeling framework to simulate the seismic performance of prestressed concrete T-beams retrofitted in the negative moment region using near-surface-mounted (NSM) CFRP rods and sheets. The model incorporates nonlinear material behavior and cohesive interaction at the CFRP-concrete interface and is validated against experimental benchmarks, with ultimate load prediction errors of 4.41% for RC T-beams, 0.49% for prestressed I-beams, and 1.30% for prestressed slabs. A parametric investigation was conducted to examine the influence of CFRP embedment depth and initial prestressing level under three seismic conditions. The results showed that fully embedded CFRP rods consistently improved the beams' ultimate load capacity, with gains of up to 10.84%, 16.84%, and 14.91% under cyclic loading, near-fault ground motion, and far-field ground motion, respectively. Half-embedded CFRP rods also prove effective and offer comparable improvements where full-depth installation is impractical. The cyclic load-displacement histories, the time-load histories under near-fault and far-field excitations, stiffness degradation, and damage contour analysis further confirm that the synergy between full-depth CFRP retrofitting and optimized prestressing enhances structural resilience and energy dissipation under seismic excitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.