Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41010211›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Use of Experimental and Numerical Results in the Prototyping of 3D-Printed Water Jets.

Paweł Madejski, Dominik Buksa, Mateusz Bryk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Paweł MadejskiDepartment of Power Systems and Environmental Protection Facilities, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Robotics, AGH University of Krakow, Adama Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9097-679X
Dominik BuksaStrata Mechanics Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Reymonta 27, 30-059 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0009-0003-3981-7499
Mateusz BrykEnergy Conversion Department, Institute of Fluid-Flow Machinery, Polish Academy of Sciences, Fiszera 14, 80-231 Gdansk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3696-2423

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid prototyping methods have gained increasing interest across various industries in recent years. Among these methods, 3D printing technology is increasingly used for prototype production, mainly due to its relatively low development and manufacturing costs and the short time required for physical fabrication. This paper presents the integration of 3D printing methods with experimental results as an example of the application of rapid prototyping techniques to examining water jet nozzles. Four different nozzle shapes were investigated. Water nozzle design enables control over the flow stream, its range, and efficiency, tailored to specific requirements. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) was combined with 3D printing to ensure fast answers and to enable a comparison of the proposed solutions. Nozzle prototypes were manufactured using an FDM-based 3D printer and PLA material. The new evaluation criteria coefficient is proposed to calculate the nozzle printing fabrication efficiency.

Indexed as

computational fluid dynamicsfused deposition modelingrapid prototypingwater nozzle

Identifiers

PMID41010211
PMCPMC12471428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.