Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41010168›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Method of Material Selection Considering Quality, Environmental, and Cost Aspects.

Andrzej Pacana, Dominika Siwiec

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andrzej PacanaFaculty of Mechanical Engineering and Aeronautics, Rzeszow University of Technology, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1121-6352
Dominika SiwiecFaculty of Mechanical Engineering and Aeronautics, Rzeszow University of Technology, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6663-6621

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Product innovations often involve changes to materials. Various material alternatives are typically sought to improve product quality. Currently, following the current trend of sustainable product development, it is necessary to consider environmental impact. This also applies to materials, particularly their acquisition method. At the same time, modern products should be characterized by low production costs. Despite this, there is a lack of a coherent, standardized method to support decisions about material selection by considering all these aspects during the design or product improvement phase. Therefore, the aim of this research is to develop a method for selecting materials during final product improvement, taking into account quality, environmental impact in the life cycle context, and manufacturing costs. The method is implemented in eight stages and involves calculating the following indicators: (i) quality (satisfaction with use), (ii) environmental impact (for material extraction and acquisition), and (iii) decision-making based on manufacturing costs. Calculations to obtain these indicators were performed using OpenLCA 2.0.0 with the Ecoinvent database, formalized scoring (PS), cost analysis, and morphological analysis. The results of the method lead to the selection of favorable hypothetical prototypes resulting from the proposed material changes. The method was tested using a six-speed manual transmission from a light vehicle. The results showed that the decision-making process for selecting a prototype from among possible material modifications varies. The proposed method can be used for any newly created or modified product at the material selection stage.

Indexed as

life cycle assessmentmaterial modificationsmaterial selectionmechanical engineeringproduction engineeringproduct quality

Identifiers

PMID41010168
PMCPMC12471553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.