ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Sulphate Resistance of Alkali-Activated Material Produced Using Wood Ash.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Construction and Building Materials: Highlights from the 2025 Editor's Choice Collection.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Sulphate resistance of geopolymer mortars incorporating waste clay brick powder.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Effects of Alkali Modulus on Early-Age Performance and Hydration Mechanisms of Slag-Phosphogypsum Composite Alkali-Activated Materials.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The durability of construction and building materials under sulphate environments is an important indicator to evaluate their service life. In this study, the physical and mechanical behaviours of wood-ash-based alkali-activated materials (AAMs) incorporating coal fly ash, metakaolin, natural zeolite, and calcined phosphogypsum were assessed before and after being subjected to sodium sulphate corrosion cycles via the compressive strength, mass, and volume changes. The microstructure, elemental composition, and phase identification were further analysed using X-Ray Diffraction(XRD) and scanning electron microscope(SEM). The results show that the exposure to sulphate solution caused decalcification and dealumination of hydrates, releasing calcium and aluminium to react with sulphate and forming expansive erosion products, ettringite and gypsum. This contributed to the microstructural damage, leading to mass change, volume expansion, and compressive strength loss of 7.33, 1.29, and 60.42%. The introduction of binary aluminosilicate precursors enhanced the sulphate resistance by forming a well-bonded microstructure consisting of calcium (aluminate) silicate hydrate and sodium aluminate silicate hydrate, with the compressive strength loss decreasing up to 18.60%. The co-usage of calcined phosphogypsum deteriorated the mechanical properties of AAMs but significantly improved the sulphate resistance. The sodium sulphate environment facilitated anhydrate hydration, generating more sulphate hydrates and hemigypsums that co-existed with erosion products, forming a compact microstructure and improving the compressive strength by twofold.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.