ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Advancements in In-Situ Monitoring Technologies for Detecting Process-Induced Defects in the Directed Energy Deposition Process: A Comprehensive Review.
Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Acoustic Source Localisation of Crack Initiation During Laser-Based DED: Experimental Validation and Challenges.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Laser-based directed energy deposition for metallic materials (DED-LB/M) is a versatile additive manufacturing (AM) technique that facilitates the deposition of advanced protective coatings, the refurbishment of degraded components, and the fabrication of intricate metallic structures. Despite the technological advancements and potential, the presence of process-induced defects poses significant challenges to the repeatability and stability of the DED-LB/M process, limiting its widespread application, particularly in industries requiring high-quality products. In-situ process monitoring stands out as a key technological intervention, offering the possibility of real-time defect detection to mitigate these challenges. Focusing on the DED-LB/M process, this review provides a comparative analysis of various in-situ monitoring techniques and their effectiveness in identifying process-induced defects. The review categorises different sensing methods based on their sensor data format, utilised data processing techniques, and their ability to detect both surface and internal defects within the fabricated structures. Furthermore, it compares the capabilities of these techniques and offers a critical analysis of their limitations in defect detection. This review concludes by discussing the major challenges that remain in implementing in-situ defect detection in industrial practice and outlines key future directions necessary to overcome them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.