Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41010090›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Recycling Foundry Sands in Concrete: A Comparative Study on the Use of Green Sand and Chemically Bonded Sand as Partial Replacements for Natural Sand.

Pietro Di Maida, Corrado Sciancalepore, Enrico Radi, Luca Lanzoni, Daniel Milanese

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pietro Di MaidaDipartimento di Scienze e Metodi dell'Ingegneria, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41122 Modena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6631-5908
Corrado SciancaleporeDipartimento di Ingegneria dei Sistemi e delle Tecnologie Industriali, University of Parma, 43124 Parma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8182-6618
Enrico RadiDipartimento di Scienze e Metodi dell'Ingegneria, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41122 Modena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7410-3008
Luca LanzoniDipartimento di Ingegneria "Enzo Ferrari", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41125 Modena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3513-0273
Daniel MilaneseDipartimento di Ingegneria dei Sistemi e delle Tecnologie Industriali, University of Parma, 43124 Parma, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, many foundries successfully reuse sand multiple times within their production cycle. However, when the sand can no longer be reused, it is disposed of, resulting in environmental damage and high disposal costs for the company. The present research aims to explore the potential reuse of foundry sands as fine aggregate in concrete. Since this by-product is classified as non-hazardous waste, it can offer interesting opportunities for the recycling of a material that is currently one of the most widely used in the construction industry. This paper studies the potential reuse of green sand (GS) and chemically bonded sand (CBS) as a partial replacement for natural sand (NS) in concrete. Concrete specimens made with 10%, 20%, and 30% of foundry sand were tested, and a comparative analysis was carried out with the standard mixture in terms of chemical-physical properties, workability, and mechanical properties. The results showed a reduction in the performance of concrete specimens prepared with foundry sands. The lowest reductions in the strength, which were always below 10%, were observed for a 10% inclusion rate of both GS and CBS, with slightly better performance for CBS. Performance reductions tend to increase with higher replacement rates. However, these performance reductions turn out to be acceptable for concrete used in non-structural applications.

Indexed as

chemically bonded sandconcretedurabilitygreen sandrecyclingstrength properties

Identifiers

PMID41010090
PMCPMC12472090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.