ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Matrices of Different Natures for Bone Tissue Engineering-A Comparative Analysis.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent decades have been characterized by increasing numbers of bone tissue injuries and diseases resulting in the formation of bone defects. The number of such bone defects has also grown due to active surgical approaches implemented after surgical interventions for oncological, infectious, and dystrophic bone lesions. To repair such bone defects requires the use of bone tissue substitutes. Nowadays, constructs based on matrices of various compositions and structures, supplemented with the addition of biologically active components (including growth factors and cells), are the most promising approaches used in bone tissue engineering. The properties of the matrices are of the utmost importance in construct formation. This work presents the results of a comprehensive study of matrices of various natures intended for the formation of complex constructs for bone tissue engineering. Using a set of methods for studying the physical, mechanical, and biological characteristics, the total and associated porosity of the studied matrices, the structure, the mechanical parameters, and the level of cytotoxicity and cytocompatibility were determined. It was shown that all the studied materials were not cytotoxic (cytotoxicity rank of all matrices = 0-1). All matrices were porous, but samples of materials of biological origin had large pores ranging in size from 100 to 1000 μm, and pores of the hybrid polymer were sized from 0.1 to 100 μm. Total and open porosity ranged from 89% and 79% for the allogeneic matrix up to 67% and 48% for the hybrid polymer, respectively, while the σ values (compressive stress at break) of samples of all studied materials were close to each other. When human test culture MSCs interact with samples of these materials, it was shown that the cells adhere to the surface and structure of all materials and retain typical morphology, while also demonstrating the ability to proliferate and migrate along the surface and into the matrix structure, i.e., all materials are cytocompatible. Based on the data obtained, it can be assumed that all the studied matrices can be used for model biomedical studies and as a basis for constructs for bone tissue engineering. An adequate choice of research method at the earliest stages of the development of each material will ensure the most effective approaches for further work and subsequent use of this product.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.