Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41010089›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Matrices of Different Natures for Bone Tissue Engineering-A Comparative Analysis.

D Ya Aleinik, A E Bokov, D D Linkova, E A Levicheva, E A Farafontova, R S Kovylin, V V Yudin, D V Khramova, L A Cherdantseva, S A Chesnokov and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

D Ya AleinikFederal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education, Privolzhsky Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Nizhny Novgorod 603005, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-1482-4281
A E BokovFederal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education, Privolzhsky Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Nizhny Novgorod 603005, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-5203-0717
D D LinkovaFederal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education, Privolzhsky Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Nizhny Novgorod 603005, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3879-8460
E A LevichevaFederal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education, Privolzhsky Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Nizhny Novgorod 603005, Russia.ORCID 0009-0006-3807-1412
E A FarafontovaFederal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education, Privolzhsky Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Nizhny Novgorod 603005, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-7940-0880
R S KovylinG. A. Razuvaev Institute of Organometallic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Nizhny Novgorod 603137, Russia.
V V YudinFederal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education, Privolzhsky Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Nizhny Novgorod 603005, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-8249-8572
D V KhramovaG. A. Razuvaev Institute of Organometallic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Nizhny Novgorod 603137, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3458-2814
L A CherdantsevaNovosibirsk Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics Named After Ya. L. Tsivyan, Novosibirsk 630091, Russia.
S A ChesnokovFederal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education, Privolzhsky Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Nizhny Novgorod 603005, Russia.
I A KirilovaNovosibirsk Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics Named After Ya. L. Tsivyan, Novosibirsk 630091, Russia.
M N EgorikhinaFederal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education, Privolzhsky Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Nizhny Novgorod 603005, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-8815-9651

Funding

Minister of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation the program "Priority-2030"
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent decades have been characterized by increasing numbers of bone tissue injuries and diseases resulting in the formation of bone defects. The number of such bone defects has also grown due to active surgical approaches implemented after surgical interventions for oncological, infectious, and dystrophic bone lesions. To repair such bone defects requires the use of bone tissue substitutes. Nowadays, constructs based on matrices of various compositions and structures, supplemented with the addition of biologically active components (including growth factors and cells), are the most promising approaches used in bone tissue engineering. The properties of the matrices are of the utmost importance in construct formation. This work presents the results of a comprehensive study of matrices of various natures intended for the formation of complex constructs for bone tissue engineering. Using a set of methods for studying the physical, mechanical, and biological characteristics, the total and associated porosity of the studied matrices, the structure, the mechanical parameters, and the level of cytotoxicity and cytocompatibility were determined. It was shown that all the studied materials were not cytotoxic (cytotoxicity rank of all matrices = 0-1). All matrices were porous, but samples of materials of biological origin had large pores ranging in size from 100 to 1000 μm, and pores of the hybrid polymer were sized from 0.1 to 100 μm. Total and open porosity ranged from 89% and 79% for the allogeneic matrix up to 67% and 48% for the hybrid polymer, respectively, while the σ values (compressive stress at break) of samples of all studied materials were close to each other. When human test culture MSCs interact with samples of these materials, it was shown that the cells adhere to the surface and structure of all materials and retain typical morphology, while also demonstrating the ability to proliferate and migrate along the surface and into the matrix structure, i.e., all materials are cytocompatible. Based on the data obtained, it can be assumed that all the studied matrices can be used for model biomedical studies and as a basis for constructs for bone tissue engineering. An adequate choice of research method at the earliest stages of the development of each material will ensure the most effective approaches for further work and subsequent use of this product.

Indexed as

bone defectsbone tissue substitutescytocompatibilitycytotoxicityframeworkpolymersporositystructuretissue regeneration

Identifiers

PMID41010089
PMCPMC12471662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.