Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41009957›Full record

ReviewGenes2025

Gianfranco Cosenza, Andrea Fulgione, Emanuele D'Anza, Sara Albarella, Francesca Ciotola, Alfredo Pauciullo

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Genes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gianfranco CosenzaDepartment of Agricultural Science, University of Naples Federico II, Piazza Carlo Di Borbone 1, 80055 Portici, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6006-4987
Andrea FulgioneDepartment of Agricultural Science, University of Naples Federico II, Piazza Carlo Di Borbone 1, 80055 Portici, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8646-5073
Emanuele D'AnzaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, Via Delpino 1, 80137 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8347-0910
Sara AlbarellaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, Via Delpino 1, 80137 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4018-8007
Francesca CiotolaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, Via Delpino 1, 80137 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9881-1420
Alfredo PauciulloDepartment of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences, University of Turin, 10095 Grugliasco, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3140-9373

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Splicing regulatory sequences are cornerstones for exon recognition. Mutations that modify them can severely compromise mRNA maturation and protein production. A wide range of mutations, including SNPs and InDels, can influence splicing regulatory signals either directly (e.g., altering canonical donor and acceptor dinucleotides) or indirectly (e.g., creating cryptic splice sites).

Indexed as

Alternative SplicingCaseinsAllelesAnimalsMutationRNA Splice SitesCaseinsRNA Splice Sitescaseinsdairy livestock speciesmRNAmutationssplice sites

Identifiers

PMID41009957
PMCPMC12470106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.