ArticleGenes2025
Phenotypic and Genetic Stability of the
Article in Genes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTissue culture might be a method supplementing traditional plant propagation in various fields, like agriculture, medicine, industry, and the active conservation of plant species. For the purpose of plant restoration, it is important that the obtained progenies are identical with the mother plants to ensure the true-to-typeness of the future population.
methodsIn the present study, the stability of
resultsIt was observed that two clones formed plants that displayed atypical growth structures, the shoots were shorter with many lateral shoots, and they had a lower fresh weight. They also formed fewer and smaller snap-traps, which, in the case of carnivorous plants, determines the capability of catching prey. The 35 in vitro regenerated plants and 5 specimens obtained from the natural habitat were subjected to genetic analyses with two molecular markers: start codon targeted (SCoT) polymorphism and sequence-related amplified polymorphism (SRAP). Despite the visible morphological variants, the genetic stability of all the regenerants with the individuals from natural stands was confirmed. All of them were monomorphic except three bands that were obtained for reference, where individuals were amplified with SCoT28 and me12-em13 SRAP primers.
conclusionsAs shown in the presented research, it might be recommended to use different methods to evaluate the stability of in vitro cultivated plants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.