Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41009932›Full record

ReviewAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Postoperative Infections After Appendectomy for Acute Appendicitis: The Surgeon's Checklist.

Martina Leandri, Carlo Vallicelli, Giorgia Santandrea, Daniele Perrina, Francesca Bravi, Massimo Sartelli, Federico Coccolini, Luca Ansaloni, Vanni Agnoletti, Fausto Catena

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Martina LeandriDepartment of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, 37134 Verona, Italy.
Carlo VallicelliGeneral, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Maurizio Bufalini Hospital, 47521 Cesena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9523-1324
Giorgia SantandreaGeneral, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Maurizio Bufalini Hospital, 47521 Cesena, Italy.
Daniele PerrinaGeneral, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Maurizio Bufalini Hospital, 47521 Cesena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6828-9339
Francesca BraviHealthcare Administration, Santa Maria Delle Croci Hospital, 48121 Ravenna, Italy.
Massimo SartelliDepartment of Surgery, Macerata Hospital, 62100 Macerata, Italy.
Federico CoccoliniDepartment of General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, 56124 Pisa, Italy.
Luca AnsaloniDepartment of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Vanni AgnolettiAnesthesiology and Intensive Care Unit, Maurizio Bufalini Hospital, 47521 Cesena, Italy.
Fausto CatenaGeneral, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Maurizio Bufalini Hospital, 47521 Cesena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5558-9965

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute appendicitis remains one of the most common surgical emergencies, with a lifetime incidence of approximately 7-8% in the USA and Europe. Despite the widespread adoption of the laparoscopic approach and advances made in perioperative care, post-operative infections-particularly intra-abdominal abscesses-continue to pose a substantial clinical challenge, with an overall probability that ranges from 5 to 15%. Nowadays, it is essential not only to improve patient outcomes by reducing these complications but also to promote responsible antibiotic use. This review provides an in-depth examination of post-appendectomy infections in adults, synthesizing research from the past decade. It explores the various risks involved, including those related to the patient, the disease itself, and the surgical techniques employed. There is particular emphasis on the impact of surgical approach, closure methods, timing of surgery, and intraoperative decisions such as drain placement, peritoneal lavage, and routine bacterial cultures. Part of the discussion is about emerging data regarding the use of antiseptic solutions and specimen retrieval techniques. Additionally, the review examines current approaches to managing postoperative intra-abdominal abscesses. It assesses when antibiotics are necessary, evaluates image-guided percutaneous drainage, and considers laparoscopic re-intervention as a possible solution. While recent studies offer valuable insights, the heterogeneity of available evidence highlights the pressing need for high-quality, standardized research. Ultimately, a deeper understanding of infection pathways and preventative strategies is vital-not only for reducing morbidity and hospital readmissions, but also for safeguarding the long-term efficacy of antibiotics and delivering safer, more effective surgical care.

Indexed as

abdominal drainappedectomyemergency surgeryintra-abdominal abscessesperitoneal irrigationpreventionstump closuresurgical site infection

Identifiers

PMID41009932
PMCPMC12466744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.