SynthesisInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Copper Dysregulation in Major Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analytic Evidence for a Putative Trait Marker.
Synthesis in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Urinary copper is linked to regional cortical volume reductions in adolescents with major depressive disorder.Translational psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a leading contributor to global disability. Despite advances in neurobiological research, no reliable peripheral biomarkers are currently available for diagnosis or monitoring. Copper (Cu), an essential trace element involved in redox balance and monoamine metabolism, has been repeatedly associated with MDD, though evidence remains inconsistent. To systematically evaluate and quantify differences in serum Cu concentrations between individuals with MDD and healthy controls, and to explore potential moderators, including sex, age, and analytical methodology. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies reporting serum Cu levels in MDD patients versus controls. Data were extracted regarding diagnostic criteria, measurement methods, sample characteristics, and study quality. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed based on demographic and methodological variables. Twenty-four studies, including 8617 participants (2736 MDD, 5881 controls), were analyzed. The pooled analysis revealed significantly higher Cu levels in MDD patients (Mean Difference (MD) = 2.22 µmol/L; 95% CI: 0.97-3.48;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.