Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41009784›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Stacking in Layered Covalent Organic Frameworks: A Computational Approach and PXRD Reference Guide.

Robbin Steentjes, Egbert Zojer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Robbin SteentjesInstitute of Solid State Physics, NAWI Graz, Graz University of Technology, Petersgasse 16, 8010 Graz, Austria.ORCID 0009-0005-6699-3804
Egbert ZojerInstitute of Solid State Physics, NAWI Graz, Graz University of Technology, Petersgasse 16, 8010 Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-6502-1721

Funding

Graz University of Technology Lead Project LP-03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The stacking arrangement of layered covalent organic frameworks (LCOFs) critically influences their structure and function. We present a fully ab initio-based workflow to characterize stacking disorder in COF-1, combining simulated powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) with stacking energy landscape analysis. By comparing PXRD patterns of idealized eclipsed, inclined, serrated, and staggered stacking with experiment, we rule out periodic high-symmetry motifs. A comprehensive "PXRD reference guide" links specific diffraction features to slip directions and magnitudes, providing a blueprint for the interpretation of experimental data of slipped structures. Quantum-mechanical potential energy surfaces reveal multiple symmetry-equivalent minima separated by small barriers. This makes diverse slip configurations thermally accessible and large-scale stacking disorder inevitable. Nevertheless, as staggered configurations are found to be energetically disfavored, open pore channels prevail despite the disorder. From the energy landscapes, we construct static disordered models using Boltzmann-weighted probabilities, where also the question is addressed, which energies should be used for actually calculating the Boltzmann weights. Simulated PXRD patterns from these models excellently reproduce experimental peak positions, shapes, and stacking distances, suggesting the dominance of disordered stacking not only in COF-1.

Indexed as

Metal-Organic FrameworksX-Ray DiffractionModels, MolecularPowder DiffractionQuantum TheoryMetal-Organic Frameworksab initiocovalent organic frameworksdensity functional theorydisorderLCOFstackingstructural model

Identifiers

PMID41009784
PMCPMC12471266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.