ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
The Responsiveness of Breast Cancer Cells to Varied Levels of Vitamin B12, Cisplatin, and G-CSF.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Supportive agents, such as vitamin B12 (cobalamin, B12) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), are widely used during chemotherapy; however, their direct effects on tumor biology are not well understood. We evaluated the impact of pharmacological B12 and G-CSF, alone or in combination with cisplatin, on hormone receptor-positive (MCF-7) and triple-negative (MDA-MB-231) breast cancer cells, conducting in vitro assays of cell viability, cytotoxicity, caspase activation, mitochondrial membrane potential, and cytolytic protein expression. Neither B12 nor G-CSF alone induced cytotoxicity; instead, both promoted proliferation in a dose- and time-dependent manner. When combined with cisplatin, they consistently attenuated drug-induced cytotoxicity, suppressed caspase-3/-8/-9 activation, preserved mitochondrial integrity, and reduced perforin/granzyme expression, exhibiting stronger effects in MCF-7 cells. G-CSF markedly increased proliferation (>130% at 50 ng/mL), while B12 modestly enhanced viability and mitigated cisplatin-induced damage, particularly in triple-negative cells. These findings indicate that B12 and G-CSF can impair cisplatin efficacy by blunting apoptotic signaling and mitochondrial injury in different breast cancer subtypes. These preclinical findings warrant prospective, biomarker-driven in vivo and clinical studies to delineate the clinical contexts in which B12 and G-CSF can be safely integrated into supportive care without compromising antitumor efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.