Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41009575›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

STINGing Cancer: Development, Clinical Application, and Targeted Delivery of STING Agonists.

Yannick Gabriel Nerdinger, Amanda Katharina Binder, Franziska Bremm, Niklas Feuchter, Niels Schaft, Jan Dörrie

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Biomimetic delivery of a STING agonistMaterials today. Bio · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Extracellular cGAMP in health and disease.Molecular biomedicine · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yannick Gabriel NerdingerDepartment of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5030-231X
Amanda Katharina BinderDepartment of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0009-0006-7338-8503
Franziska BremmDepartment of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6119-2542
Niklas FeuchterDepartment of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0009-0002-9104-2195
Niels SchaftDepartment of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8236-9298
Jan DörrieDepartment of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3478-0741

Funding

Bundesministerium für Forschung, Technologie und Raumfahrt 01KT2305A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As cancer incidence continues to rise and conventional therapies remain of limited effectiveness, the search for novel and innovative cancer treatments is ongoing. In recent years, immunotherapies, including checkpoint inhibitors and cell-based approaches such as CAR-T cell therapy, have revolutionized the treatment of cancer. However, response rates even to well-established immunotherapies remain low in several types of cancer. Therefore, various novel immunomodulatory substances are currently under investigation, among them agonists of the intracellular signaling protein STING (STimulator of INterferon Genes). Activation of the STING signaling pathway can alter the cytokine profile within the tumor microenvironment (TME) and reshape the function of various immune cells. STING agonists have yielded promising results in preclinical studies, but this success has not yet been replicated in clinical trials. Consequently, STING agonists are optimized for greater potency and combined with nanotechnologies to enhance biodistribution and achieve sustained accumulation within the TME. This review summarizes a selection of STING agonists evaluated in clinical trials to date and discusses their effects on tumor-infiltration immune cells, especially macrophages. It highlights emerging candidates currently under investigation in preclinical studies, and explores nanotechnological approaches for their combinational use to enhance therapeutic efficacy.

Indexed as

Membrane ProteinsNeoplasmsAnimalsHumansImmunotherapySignal TransductionSTING ProteinTumor MicroenvironmentMembrane ProteinsSTING1 protein, humanSTING Proteincancer therapyimmunotherapynano therapysmall moleculesSTING agonisttumor-associated macrophagestumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID41009575
PMCPMC12470042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.