SynthesisInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
The Female Reproductive Tract Microbiota and Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Dive into the Invisible: The Vaginal and Endometrial Microbiota in Gynecologic and Obstetric Disorders: A Narrative Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Uterine microbiota dynamics and new therapeutic opportunities in gynecological diseases.American journal of translational research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review aimed to summarize the available evidence on the associations between the female reproductive tract microbiota and endometrial cancer (EC). While gut microbiota has been studied extensively, microbial communities within the endometrium, cervix, and vagina remain relatively understudied. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for studies published up to January 2025. Predefined PECO-based criteria included studies on women or human cell models assessing genital tract microbiota in EC versus non-EC controls, focusing on composition, diversity, or function; reviews and non-microbiota studies were excluded. A total of 21 studies were included. Overall, there was a consistent depletion of protective
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.