ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Differential Modulation of Attention by Aversive Associative and Statistical Learning in Distinct Visual Search Modes.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Selection history significantly influences attentional processes. Current debates center on whether different components of selection history influence attention through shared learning-dependent mechanisms or via independent mechanisms. Recent research suggests that aversive associative learning and statistical learning, two key components of selection history, modulate attentional selection independently. The present study investigates how these two components influence attentional selection under different search strategies. In Experiment 1, participants engaged in a singleton detection task, searching for a unique shape singleton while ignoring an irrelevant color singleton. In Experiment 2, they employed a feature search strategy, targeting a predefined attribute among varied shapes while disregarding a distracting color singleton. Results showed that under the singleton detection mode, two learning processes exert independent effects on attentional selection toward salient distractors. Conversely, under the feature search mode, the two learning processes interacted, with the interaction primarily driven by aversive associative learning. These findings highlight the critical role of search strategies in modulating how selection history affects attentional processes. They offer new insights into the mechanisms of attentional selection and the interplay between different forms of learning in complex visual search environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.