Further Validation Study of the Gender-Specific Binary Depression Screening Version (GIDS-15) and Investigation of Intervention Effects.

Jan S Pellowski, Christian Wiessner, Claudia Buntrock, Hanna Christiansen

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jan S PellowskiPhilipps University Marburg, Department of Psychology, 35032 Marburg, Germany.

Christian WiessnerInstitute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.

Claudia BuntrockInstitute of Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Medical Faculty, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4974-5455

Hanna ChristiansenPhilipps University Marburg, Department of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 35032 Marburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Men and women differ in the manifestation of depression. At the same time, there is a lack of gender-sensitive depression questionnaires in Germany. This study investigated the Gender-specific binary depression screening version (GIDS-15) in a further validation step. In a two-armed, pragmatic single-blind randomised controlled clinical trial, we first investigated the psychometric properties and the sensitivity to change in the GIDS-15 in a sample with subclinical depression (

Indexed as

depressiongender-specific binary depression screening versionmale depressionsensitivity to changesubclinical depression

Identifiers

PMID41009283

DOI10.3390/bs15091253

PMCPMC12466554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.