Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41009257›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Teachers' Readiness to Implement Robotics in Education: Validation and Measurement Invariance of TRi-Robotics Scale via Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Network Psychometrics.

Theano Papagiannopoulou, Julie Vaiopoulou, Dimitrios Stamovlasis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Theano PapagiannopoulouSchool of Philosophy and Education, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-0394-7390
Julie VaiopoulouDepartment of Education, University of Nicosia, 2417 Nicosia, Cyprus.ORCID 0000-0002-1936-7502
Dimitrios StamovlasisSchool of Philosophy and Education, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-0808-9065

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incorporation of educational robotics (ER) into classroom learning has emerged as a significant goal in contemporary education, with instructors assuming a pivotal role. Recent research has shown the influence of teachers' perceptions of ER and their self-efficacy on the learning process, while the primary goal in these inquiries is to the development of appropriate scales that guarantee correct measurements. Serving this goal, the present study presents the TRi-Robotics scale and its psychometric properties, which assesses teachers' readiness to integrate ER into their classrooms. TRi-Robotics is a novel multidimensional tool that integrates self-efficacy, commitment, and affective conditions, validated through both CFA and network psychometrics. The proposed 14-item scale is three-dimensional and includes self-efficacy (SE), commitment (C), and affective conditions (AC). The validation procedure included the customary Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis, applied to a sample of 817 in-service teachers. Reliability analysis showed satisfactory internal consistency, while measurement invariance for gender was sustained. Furthermore, network psychometrics was applied via Exploratory Graph Analysis (EGA), which supported the proposed structure and its dimensionality and measurement invariance. The TRi-Robotics scale proved a valid instrument with satisfactory psychometric properties, and it is a significant asset to implement in educational and psychological research for testing further research hypotheses.

Indexed as

educational roboticsnetwork psychometricspsychometric propertiesvalidation

Identifiers

PMID41009257
PMCPMC12466464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.