Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41009256›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025

The Triumph of Substance: Decoding the "Functional Infotainment" Model for Sex Education on Douyin.

You Shi, Hao Gao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

You ShiSchool of Journalism & Communication, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210097, China.ORCID 0009-0002-6377-7055
Hao GaoSchool of Journalism & Communication, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210097, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9749-008X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn the digital age, short-video platforms are key channels for adolescents' sex education, yet content strategies and their effects remain unclear. This study analyzes Douyin using an integrated source-content-effect framework, identifies infotainment strategies by creator type, and examines their impact on interaction and topic engagement.

methodsQuantitative content analysis of 465 sex-education videos. Content was coded on informational and entertainment value. Four information-entertainment combinations were tested. Engagement outcomes (likes, comments, favorites, shares) were modeled with negative binomial regression; the likelihood that comments were sex-education-related was modeled with logistic regression. Creator type (medical professionals vs. individual creators) entered as a covariate.

resultsA functional-infotainment pattern emerged. High information-high entertainment performed best across all interaction metrics. Low information-high entertainment (pure entertainment) performed worst, significantly suppressing deeper engagement and topical discussion. Medical professionals emphasized medicalized, low-risk knowledge; individual creators covered more diverse topics yet likewise avoided sensitive issues.

conclusionsUnder algorithmic incentives and cultural norms, Douyin's sex-education content is not entertainment-first. Dissemination is driven by information-rich content delivered through a functional-infotainment model. Findings refine infotainment theory and offer data-driven guidance: prioritize informational value while pairing it with engaging forms (creators), support high-information content and proactive governance (platforms), and inform education policy.

Indexed as

health communicationinfotainmentsex educationshort videouser engagement

Identifiers

PMID41009256
PMCPMC12466664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.