ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Predicting Adverse Childhood Experiences from Family Environment Factors: A Machine Learning Approach.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are associated with profound long-term health and developmental consequences. However, current identification strategies are largely reactive, often missing opportunities for early intervention. Therefore, the potential of machine learning to proactively identify children at risk of ACE exposure needs to be explored. Using nationally representative data from 63,239 children in the 2018-2020 National Survey of Children's Health (NSCH) after listwise deletion, we trained and validated multiple machine learning models to predict ACE exposure categorized as none, one, or two or more ACEs. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, precision, recall, F1 scores, and area under the curve (AUC) metrics with 5-fold cross-validation. The Random Forest model achieved the highest predictive accuracy (82%) and demonstrated strong performance across ACE categories. Key predictive features included child sex (female), food insufficiency, school absenteeism, quality of parent-child communication, and experiences of bullying. The model yielded high performance in identifying children with no ACEs (F1 = 0.89) and moderate performance for those with multiple ACEs (F1 = 0.64). However, performance for the single ACE category was notably lower (F1 = 0.55), indicating challenges in predicting this intermediate group. These findings suggest that family environment factors can be leveraged to predict ACE exposure with clinically meaningful accuracy, offering a foundation for proactive screening protocols. However, implementation must carefully address systematic selection bias, clinical utility limitations, and ethical considerations regarding predictive modeling of vulnerable children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.