ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Post-Pandemic Surges in Public Trust in the United Kingdom.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Trust in public institutions was challenged during the COVID-19 global pandemic, with widespread mistrust towards healthcare institutions as well as fellow public institutions. Concurrently, a new public institution or social tool, mass-market artificial intelligence (AI), more broadly emerged, which too may be a target of fluctuating public trust. Using national survey data from the United Kingdom's Centre for Data Ethics and Innovation (survey year: 2022, N = 4320; survey year: 2023, N = 4232), we explore the level of trust in civic institutions (healthcare, non-healthcare, and AI) during and immediately after the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom using a naturalistic quasi-experimental design. At both waves (2022 and 2023), principal component analysis and structural equation modeling over thirteen public institutions and AI variables confirmed three factors (or domains) of public trust: trust in healthcare institutions, trust in fellow civic institutions other than healthcare, and trust in AI. Measurement invariance testing of mean levels of public trust along each distinct component revealed that as compared with 2022, in 2023, (1) trust in healthcare institutions and in fellow civic institutions other than healthcare significantly increased and (2) trust in AI remained approximately level. Next, latent profile modeling revealed four levels of a common public trust profile, with all three domains of public trust being normatively closely associated. Taken together, these results suggest that a psychological stance of public trust, PT, may increase after a societal crisis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.