Examining the Interaction Between Perceived Neighborhood Disorder, Positive Peers, and Self-Esteem on Adolescent Prosocial Behavior: A Study of Chinese Adolescents.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. The Longitudinal Relationship Between Intrinsic Motivation, Grade Motivation and Prosocial Behavior in Chinese Adolescents: A Cross-Lagged Panel Study.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
   Article
2. The Longitudinal Relationship Between Perceived Discrimination and Prosocial Behaviors: The Roles of Self-Esteem and Coping Styles.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
   Article
3. Peer Relationships and Psychosocial Difficulties in Adolescents: Evidence from a Clinical Pediatric Sample.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

Abstract

Indexed as