ArticleCancers2025
Neoadjuvant Therapy in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Aligning Guideline Recommendations with Real-World Evidence.
Article in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pancreatic Steatosis as a Risk Phenotype for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Pattern of HER2 and HER3 Overexpression in Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Observational
- Efficacy comparison of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy versus conventional distal pancreatectomy in the treatment of left-sided pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Surgical and survival outcomes of neoadjuvant IMRT-based chemoradiotherapy versus upfront surgery in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the most lethal malignancies, with a 5-year overall survival below 12% and high recurrence rates even after R0 resection. Traditionally managed with a "surgery-first" approach, two consistent observations-the near-universal presence of micrometastatic disease at diagnosis and the frequent inability to complete adjuvant therapy-have driven the integration of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) into clinical practice. NAT offers several theoretical and practical advantages: early systemic control of occult disease, improved delivery and completion of multimodal treatment, biological selection of surgical candidates, and increased R0 resection rates. While in borderline resectable PDAC, randomized trials have consistently demonstrated improved margin-negative resection rates and early survival benefits compared with upfront surgery, in resectable PDAC, evidence is more heterogeneous. Real-world studies corroborate trial findings, reporting higher R0 rates and reduced lymph node positivity without increased perioperative risk, but also highlight substantial heterogeneity in regimens, duration, and radiotherapy use. Limitations to universal NAT adoption include reliance on anatomy-based resectability criteria, absence of validated predictive biomarkers, challenges in response assessment, and concerns over disease progression during preoperative treatment. Future developments will focus on integrating molecular profiling, circulating tumor DNA dynamics, and advanced imaging into patient selection and treatment adaptation, supported by biomarker-enriched and adaptive trial designs. NAT is thus evolving from a selective strategy for borderline disease to an innovative framework to optimize multimodal treatment delivery and refine patient selection in PDAC, with the potential to improve surgical outcomes and inform systemic therapy decisions in both resectable and borderline resectable settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.