ReviewCancers2025
Histotripsy: Recent Advances, Clinical Applications, and Future Prospects.
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Interventional therapeutic strategies for metastatic liver cancer].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2026Review
- Closing the global surgical divide: histotripsy, a pathway to universal access?Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Research progress on the antitumor immune regulation mechanisms and combined treatment strategies of histotripsy: A review.Medicine · 2026Review
- The Potential and Challenges of Focused Ultrasound-Mediated Therapies in the Management of Liver and Biliary Tract Cancers.Cancers · 2026Review
- Passive cavitation imaging with pMedical physics · 2026Article
- Ultrasound-driven mechanical immunomodulation enhances tumor treatment sensitivity: advances from tumor mechanical immunobiology to immunotherapy applications.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Histotripsy is a novel, non-invasive ultrasound-based ablative therapy that destroys tissue through focused cavitation. As solid tumors continue to be a major global health burden, there is interest in image-guided ablation techniques that reduce collateral damage and promote immune activation. This narrative review aims to synthesize current advancements, clinical applications, limitations, and future directions of histotripsy in both oncologic and non-oncologic contexts. A comprehensive literature search was conducted from database inception to July 2025. Search terms included combinations of subject headings and keywords such as "histotripsy," "mechanical ablation," "ultrasound," and "solid tumors." Boolean operators and truncation were used to increase sensitivity. Peer-reviewed studies were included, encompassing preclinical, clinical, and review articles. Reference lists of relevant articles were examined to identify additional sources. Histotripsy has shown strong potential in the treatment of tumors involving the liver, pancreas, kidney, brain, and cardiovascular system. It offers real-time imaging guidance, sharp lesion boundaries, and minimal damage to surrounding structures. Early clinical trials have demonstrated encouraging safety and efficacy, particularly in liver and kidney tumors. Its ability to preserve critical anatomy and stimulate innate and adaptive immune responses through the release of cellular debris and cytokines offers advantages over thermal ablation. Limitations include acoustic aberration, motion-related targeting challenges, and the need for further long-term clinical data. Histotripsy represents a promising advancement in noninvasive tumor ablation. Continued clinical investigation and technological refinement are necessary to validate its therapeutic value and define its role within comprehensive cancer care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.