ArticleCancers2025
Clinicopathological Features and Outcomes of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Lymphoepithelioma-like Carcinoma.
Article in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesThe curability of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma (LELC) remains unclear, as this rare histological subtype is not well represented in current guidelines. We aimed to evaluate the clinicopathological features and outcomes of early gastric LELC following ESD.
methodsWe retrospectively compared 51 patients with early gastric LELC and 8243 patients with well- or moderately differentiated (WD or MD) tubular adenocarcinoma who underwent ESD.
resultsLELC was more frequently located in the proximal stomach than WD/MD adenocarcinoma (52.9% vs. 10.3%). The deep submucosal invasion rate was significantly higher in LELC (77.3% vs. 9.5%), whereas the lymphatic invasion rate was comparable between the two groups (5.7% vs. 9.2%). No LELC cases were diagnosed preoperatively using forceps biopsy. Despite the comparable en bloc with R0 and complete resection rates, the curative resection rate of LELC was significantly lower than that of WD/MD adenocarcinoma, primarily due to deep submucosal invasion. Post-ESD bleeding was more frequent in LELC (11.3% vs. 2.7%). During a mean follow-up of 38.1 months, no extra-gastric recurrence was observed in patients who did not undergo additional surgery, and no lymph node metastasis was detected among the 23 patients who underwent gastrectomy. No gastric cancer-specific deaths occurred in the study population during follow-up.
conclusionsConsidering these favorable long-term outcomes despite a low curative resection rate, early gastric LELC fulfilling the conventional curative criteria of current guidelines can be regarded as having been curatively treated by ESD, particularly in patients with high surgical morbidity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.