ReviewCancers2025
Evaluating the Evolving Treatment Landscape of Systemic Therapies in Penile Cancer.
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Neoadjuvant Treatment for Penile Cancer: A Systematic Review of Contemporary Evidence.Cancers · 2026Review
- Radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy achieves clinical complete response in elderly metastatic penile cancer: a case report.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- [Personalized systemic therapy of penile cancer: molecular targets and new therapeutic horizons].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) represents a malignancy with low incidence. Despite advances in chemotherapy-based management, outcomes for patients with locally advanced and metastatic disease remain poor, with 5-year survival rates of 51% and 9%, respectively. Early diagnosis is crucial, yet psychosocial/structural barriers often delay it. Treatment strategies are stage-dependent, ranging from organ-sparing surgery and targeted radiotherapy for early-stage disease to cisplatin-based chemotherapy for locally advanced and metastatic cases. However, systemic therapies provide modest survival benefits and can expose the patient to unnecessary toxicities. Immunotherapy has emerged as a promising area, given the high expression of PD-L1 in PSCC and the significant proportion of HPV-driven tumors. Although initial results from immunotherapy-based trials are limited, preliminary trials such as HERCULES, ALPACA, PULSE, and PERICLES aim to define their role better. Similarly, combination regimens utilizing toripalimab in combination with nimotuzumab and taxane-based chemotherapy (TNT) followed by consolidative surgery are currently underway. Furthermore, the development of therapeutic HPV vaccines offers a novel strategy to enhance local antitumor immunity. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) targeting HER-2, Trop-2, and Nectin-4 antigens represent another evolving therapeutic avenue that has shown preliminary promising results. As the landscape of penile cancer treatment continues to grow, incorporating these novel strategies could further improve survival outcomes and/or offer improved quality of life. This review provides a comprehensive overview of emerging systemic therapies in PSCC, underscoring ongoing research efforts to address unmet needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.