ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Electroencephalography-Based Machine Learning for Biomarker Detection in Dyslexia and Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Comparative Review of Models, Features, and Diagnostic Utility.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- The Emerging Role of Explainable Artificial Intelligence in EEG-Based Autism Research: A Systematic Review.NeuroSci · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To uncover neurobiological indicators related to autism spectrum disorders and developmental dyslexia, this article gives a full overview of the most recent advances in machine learning and deep learning methods based on electroencephalography. We look into methodological pipelines that include signal gathering, preprocessing, feature engineering, model selection, and interpretability procedures. We based these pipelines on 15 peer-reviewed research papers published between 2013 and 2025. Most of the research employed the 10-20 system for resting-state EEG and followed MATLAB, MNE-Python, or EEGLAB guidelines for preprocessing. The feature sets included spectral power, functional connectivity, task-evoked potentials, and entropy measures. People used many standard ML methods, such as support vector machines and random forests, as well as more advanced models, like deep neural networks and transformer-based architectures. Several studies found that both dyslexic and ASD groups did well at classifying, with accuracy scores between 82% and 99.2%. The new models could be used in therapeutic settings, but there are still problems with how easy they are to understand and how well they apply to a wide range of situations. This is especially true for ASD because its spectrum is so varied.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.