Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41008759›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Electroencephalography-Based Machine Learning for Biomarker Detection in Dyslexia and Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Comparative Review of Models, Features, and Diagnostic Utility.

Günet Eroğlu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Günet EroğluComputer Engineering Department, Engineering and Nature Faculty, Bahçeşehir University, Istanbul 34000, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-8382-8417

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To uncover neurobiological indicators related to autism spectrum disorders and developmental dyslexia, this article gives a full overview of the most recent advances in machine learning and deep learning methods based on electroencephalography. We look into methodological pipelines that include signal gathering, preprocessing, feature engineering, model selection, and interpretability procedures. We based these pipelines on 15 peer-reviewed research papers published between 2013 and 2025. Most of the research employed the 10-20 system for resting-state EEG and followed MATLAB, MNE-Python, or EEGLAB guidelines for preprocessing. The feature sets included spectral power, functional connectivity, task-evoked potentials, and entropy measures. People used many standard ML methods, such as support vector machines and random forests, as well as more advanced models, like deep neural networks and transformer-based architectures. Several studies found that both dyslexic and ASD groups did well at classifying, with accuracy scores between 82% and 99.2%. The new models could be used in therapeutic settings, but there are still problems with how easy they are to understand and how well they apply to a wide range of situations. This is especially true for ASD because its spectrum is so varied.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceautism spectrum disorderdyslexiaEEG biomarkersmachine learningsynaptic connectivity

Identifiers

PMID41008759
PMCPMC12468693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.